The short answer.
California excludes wages paid to a live-in IHSS provider from both CalFresh and CalWORKs income. The exclusion applies when the provider and the IHSS recipient share the same home and the provider has filed Form SOC 2298 with the state. When the provider does not live in the home, the same wages are counted as earned income for both programs.
The rule comes from a 2014 federal IRS notice on Medicaid waiver payments and was adopted into California public-benefits practice through three All-County Letters: ACL 16-01 set the framework, ACL 16-89 implemented it for CalFresh, and ACL 19-94 implemented it for CalWORKs.
Why the rule exists.
Before 2014, IHSS wages paid to a family member providing care in the family home were treated like any other earned income. A daughter caring for her father, paid by IHSS, would see those wages counted against the household’s CalFresh and CalWORKs eligibility. Families were effectively penalized for keeping a parent at home instead of placing them in a facility, even though keeping the parent at home was the cheaper public outcome.
IRS Notice 2014-7 treated certain Medicaid waiver payments to a live-in care provider as “difficulty of care” payments excluded from federal gross income. California adopted the same treatment for state income tax and then, through CDSS, extended the exclusion into the means-tested benefit programs the same household was likely to be enrolled in.
What “live-in” actually means.
Live-in is a status the provider self-certifies. The legal definition is that the provider and the recipient share the same home as their principal place of residence. The provider sleeps in the home, gets mail there, and uses it as their primary address. Short trips away from the home do not break live-in status. A separate legal address kept for other reasons does break it.
The status is declared on Form SOC 2298, the Live-In Self-Certification Form. The provider signs the form and submits it to CDSS. From that point on, IHSS payroll treats the wages as excluded from federal and state income tax. When the provider stops living with the recipient, Form SOC 2299 is filed and the exclusion ends.
How CalFresh applies the rule.
ACL 16-89 directs county CalFresh workers to exclude IHSS wages paid to a live-in provider from both the gross-income test (130 percent of the federal poverty level for most households) and the net-income test (100 percent of the federal poverty level). The wage does not appear anywhere in the eligibility calculation when SOC 2298 is on file.
Two practical consequences follow. First, a live-in family provider who would otherwise be over the income limit because of IHSS wages can still qualify for CalFresh. Second, the IHSS recipient’s household composition matters. If the recipient and the provider live together as one household for purchasing and preparing food, they apply for CalFresh as one household. If the recipient buys and prepares food separately even though they share a residence, they may apply as a separate elderly or disabled household, which has a different (and often more favorable) income test.
How CalWORKs applies the rule.
ACL 19-94 extended the same exclusion to CalWORKs. Wages paid to a live-in IHSS provider are not counted in determining CalWORKs eligibility or the Maximum Aid Payment (MAP) grant amount. The exclusion applies regardless of whether the provider is the head of the assistance unit, a parent, or a stepparent.
CalWORKs is more often relevant when the IHSS recipient is a minor child with a disability and a parent is the paid live-in provider. Without the exclusion, the parent’s IHSS wages would routinely push the family over the CalWORKs income limit. With the exclusion, the family can keep CalWORKs and have a paid caregiver in the home at the same time.
Common ways the rule gets misapplied.
- The provider filed SOC 2298 with the IHSS payroll system but never gave a copy to the CalFresh or CalWORKs eligibility worker. The eligibility system shows the wages as countable income because the county is reading a different report. The fix is a one-page memo to the worker with SOC 2298 attached.
- The county counts IHSS wages because the case file lists the provider and recipient at different mailing addresses. A common reason is a P.O. box used for mail. The fix is a written declaration that the residential address is shared.
- The provider is a parent of a minor IHSS recipient and the county treats the wages as parental earned income. ACL 19-94 directly addresses this case. The wages are excluded.
- The provider has both IHSS live-in wages and a separate non-IHSS job. Only the live-in IHSS wages are excluded. The other job’s wages are counted as earned income normally.
- The provider moved out partway through the year. SOC 2299 should have been filed at that point. For the months the provider lived in the home, the exclusion applies. For the months after, it does not.
Fixing a denial that ignored the exclusion.
- Request the Notice of Action in writing. It will show the income numbers the county used. Confirm whether IHSS wages were counted.
- File a Request for State Hearing within 90 days of the Notice. The form is on the CDSS website and can be mailed, faxed, or filed online.
- Gather three documents for the hearing: a copy of SOC 2298, an IHSS payroll printout showing the wages, and a written statement that the provider and the recipient share the same home as their principal residence.
- Counties frequently resolve these cases before the hearing date, once the eligibility worker reviews the file with SOC 2298 in hand. Benefits may be paid retroactively to the original application month.
What this article does not cover.
SSI treats live-in IHSS wages under a different set of rules and is not covered here. Medi-Cal eligibility for the IHSS recipient depends on the recipient’s own income, not the provider’s, so the live-in exclusion does not change it. Federal and state income-tax treatment of live-in IHSS wages is related but is a separate analysis from the CalFresh and CalWORKs treatment described above.